We use awk in other 9 or so places, and here it's gawk.
Since this is on Linux, most probably awk is gawk.
So s/gawk/awk/.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
The situation when /sys/fs/cgroup/unified is not present normal and
should not result in anything on stderr. Suppress it.
Fixes: cc15b887a0
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
cgroup v2 requires CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF kernel option to be set
else runc can not start containers.
check-config.sh script checks if the CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF option
is set. The script checks if version of kernel is atleast
4.15 and cgroup v2 is being used before checking if the
CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF option is set.
Closes#3547
Signed-off-by: dharmicksai <dharmicksaik@gmail.com>
The v6.0.0 release of go-criu has deprecated the `rpc` package in favour
of the `crit` package. This commit provides the changes required to use
this version in runc.
Signed-off-by: Prajwal S N <prajwalnadig21@gmail.com>
Add a debug print of seccomp flags value, so the test can check
those (without using something like strace, that is).
Amend the flags setting test with the numeric values expected, and the
logic to check those.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Commit 58ea21daef added support for seccomp flags such as
SPEC_ALLOW, but it does not work as expected, because since commit
7a8d7162f9 we do not use libseccomp-golang's Load(), but
handle flags separately in patchbfp.
This fixes setting SPEC_ALLOW flag.
Add a comment to not forget to amend filterFlags when adding new flags.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
A regression reported for runc v1.1.3 says that "runc exec -t" fails
after doing "systemctl daemon-reload":
> exec failed: unable to start container process: open /dev/pts/0: operation not permitted: unknown
Apparently, with commit 7219387eb7 we are no longer adding
"DeviceAllow=char-pts rwm" rule (because os.Stat("char-pts") returns
ENOENT).
The bug can only be seen after "systemctl daemon-reload" because runc
also applies the same rules manually (by writing to devices.allow for
cgroup v1), and apparently reloading systemd leads to re-applying the
rules that systemd has (thus removing the char-pts access).
The fix is to do os.Stat only for "/dev" paths.
Also, emit a warning that the path was skipped. Since the original idea
was to emit less warnings, demote the level to debug.
Note this also fixes the issue of not adding "m" permission for block-*
and char-* devices.
A test case is added, which reliably fails before the fix
on both cgroup v1 and v2.
Fixes: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/issues/3551
Fixes: 7219387eb7
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Recently released codespell 2.2 adds some more false positives,
such as:
./Makefile:78: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
./Makefile:88: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
./notify_socket.go:51: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
./LICENSE:128: complies ==> compiles
./go.sum:59: BU ==> BY
./types/features/features.go:17: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
./libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go:52: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
./libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go:166: ro ==> to, row, rob, rod, roe, rot
....
./tests/integration/cgroup_delegation.bats:38: inh ==> in
...
To fix:
- exclude go.sum;
- add ro and complies to the list of ignored words;
- s/inh/inherit in cgroup_delegation.bats.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Since Go 1.19, godoc recognizes lists, code blocks, headings etc. It
also reformats the sources making it more apparent that these features
are used.
Fix a few places where it misinterpreted the formatting (such as
indented vs unindented), and format the result using the gofumpt
from HEAD, which already incorporates gofmt 1.19 changes.
Some more fixes (and enhancements) might be required.
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
When golang 1.19 is used to build unit tests on 386, it fails like this:
sudo -E PATH="$PATH" -- make GOARCH=386 CGO_ENABLED=1 localunittest
<...>
go test -timeout 3m -tags "seccomp" -v ./...
<...>
# github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/capabilities.test
runtime/cgo(.text): unknown symbol __stack_chk_fail_local in pcrel
runtime/cgo(.text): unknown symbol __stack_chk_fail_local in pcrel
runtime/cgo(.text): unknown symbol __stack_chk_fail_local in pcrel
runtime/cgo(.text): unknown symbol __stack_chk_fail_local in pcrel
runtime/cgo(.text): unknown symbol __stack_chk_fail_local in pcrel
runtime/cgo(.text): relocation target __stack_chk_fail_local not defined
runtime/cgo(.text): relocation target __stack_chk_fail_local not defined
The fix is to add CGO_CFLAGS=-fno-stack-protector.
See also:
- https://github.com/docker-library/golang/pull/426
- https://go.dev/issue/52919
- https://go.dev/issue/54313
- https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/421935
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Unless the container's runtime config has intelRdt configuration set,
any checks for whether Intel RDT is supported or the resctrl filesystem
is mounted are a waste of time as, per the OCI Runtime Spec, "the
runtime MUST NOT manipulate any resctrl pseudo-filesystems." And in the
likely case where Intel RDT is supported by both the hardware and
kernel but the resctrl filesystem is not mounted, these checks can get
expensive as the intelrdt package needs to parse mountinfo to check
whether the filesystem has been mounted to a non-standard path.
Optimize for the common case of containers with no intelRdt
configuration by only performing the checks when the container has opted
in.
Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
The OCI runtime spec mandates "[i]f intelRdt is not set, the runtime
MUST NOT manipulate any resctrl pseudo-filesystems." Attempting to
delete files counts as manipulating, so stop doing that when the
container's RDT configuration is nil.
Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
The intelrdt package only needs to parse mountinfo to find the mount
point of the resctrl filesystem. Users are generally going to mount the
resctrl filesystem to the pre-created /sys/fs/resctrl directory, so
there is a common case where mountinfo parsing is not required. Optimize
for the common case with a fast path which checks both for the existence
of the /sys/fs/resctrl directory and whether the resctrl filesystem was
mounted to that path using a single statfs syscall.
Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
Reading /proc/cpuinfo is a surprisingly expensive operation. Since
kernel version 4.12 [1], opening /proc/cpuinfo on an x86 system can
block for around 20 milliseconds while the kernel samples the current
CPU frequency. There is a very recent patch [2] which gets rid of the
delay, but has yet to make it into the mainline kenel. Regardless,
kernels for which opening /proc/cpuinfo takes 20ms will continue to be
run in production for years to come. libcontainer only opens
/proc/cpuinfo to read the processor feature flags so all the delays to
get an accurate snapshot of the CPU frequency are just wasted time.
If we wanted to, we could interrogate the CPU features directly from
userspace using the `CPUID` instruction. However, Intel and AMD CPUs
have flags in different positions for their analogous sub-features and
there are CPU quirks [3] which would need to be accounted for. Some
Haswell server CPUs support RDT/CAT but are missing the `CPUID` flags
advertising their support; the kernel checks for support on that
processor family by probing the the hardware using privileged
RDMSR/WRMSR instructions [4]. This sort of probing could not be
implemented in userspace so it would not be possible to check for RDT
feature support in userspace without false negatives on some hardware
configurations.
It looks like libcontainer reads the CPU feature flags as a kind of
optimization so that it can skip checking whether the kernel supports an
RDT sub-feature if the hardware support is missing. As the kernel only
exposes subtrees in the `resctrl` filesystem for RDT sub-features with
hardware and kernel support, checking the CPU feature flags is redundant
from a correctness point of view. Remove the /proc/cpuinfo check as it
is an optimization which actually hurts performance.
[1]: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/526679
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220415161206.875029458@linutronix.de/
[3]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/7cf6a8a17f5b134b7e783c2d45c53298faef82a7/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c#L834-L851
[4]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/a6b450573b912316ad36262bfc70e7c3870c56d1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c#L111-L153
Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
Kir Kolyshkin