Our handling for name space paths with user namespaces has been broken for a long time. In particular, the need to parse /proc/self/*id_map in quite a few places meant that we would treat userns configurations that had a namespace path as if they were a userns configuration without mappings, resulting in errors. The primary issue was down to the id translation helper functions, which could only handle configurations that had explicit mappings. Obviously, when joining a user namespace we need to map the ids but figuring out the correct mapping is non-trivial in comparison. In order to get the mapping, you need to read /proc/<pid>/*id_map of a process inside the userns -- while most userns paths will be of the form /proc/<pid>/ns/user (and we have a fast-path for this case), this is not guaranteed and thus it is necessary to spawn a process inside the container and read its /proc/<pid>/*id_map files in the general case. As Go does not allow us spawn a subprocess into a target userns, we have to use CGo to fork a sub-process which does the setns(2). To be honest, this is a little dodgy in regards to POSIX signal-safety(7) but since we do no allocations and we are executing in the forked context from a Go program (not a C program), it should be okay. The other alternative would be to do an expensive re-exec (a-la nsexec which would make several other bits of runc more complicated), or to use nsenter(1) which might not exist on the system and is less than ideal. Because we need to logically remap users quite a few times in runc (including in "runc init", where joining the namespace is not feasable), we cache the mapping inside the libcontainer config struct. A future patch will make sure that we stop allow invalid user configurations where a mapping is specified as well as a userns path to join. Finally, add an integration test to make sure we don't regress this again. Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
runc Integration Tests
Integration tests provide end-to-end testing of runc.
Note that integration tests do not replace unit tests.
As a rule of thumb, code should be tested thoroughly with unit tests. Integration tests on the other hand are meant to test a specific feature end to end.
Integration tests are written in bash using the bats (Bash Automated Testing System) framework.
Running integration tests
The easiest way to run integration tests is with Docker:
$ make integration
Alternatively, you can run integration tests directly on your host through make:
$ sudo make localintegration
Or you can just run them directly using bats
$ sudo bats tests/integration
To run a single test bucket:
$ make integration TESTPATH="/checkpoint.bats"
To run them on your host, you need to set up a development environment plus bats (Bash Automated Testing System).
For example:
$ cd ~/go/src/github.com
$ git clone https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core.git
$ cd bats-core
$ ./install.sh /usr/local
Note
: There are known issues running the integration tests using devicemapper as a storage driver, make sure that your docker daemon is using aufs if you want to successfully run the integration tests.
Writing integration tests
helper functions are provided in order to facilitate writing tests.
#!/usr/bin/env bats
# This will load the helpers.
load helpers
# setup is called at the beginning of every test.
function setup() {
setup_busybox
}
# teardown is called at the end of every test.
function teardown() {
teardown_bundle
}
@test "this is a simple test" {
runc run containerid
# "The runc macro" automatically populates $status, $output and $lines.
# Please refer to bats documentation to find out more.
[ "$status" -eq 0 ]
# check expected output
[[ "${output}" == *"Hello"* ]]
}